Rio Grande Royalty Co. v. Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion For Leave to Amend To Assert a Claim for Common Law Fraud (Doc. No. 31) and Defendants’ Cross-Motion To Dismiss the Proposed Class Action Complaint (Doc. No. 33). For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion must be granted and Plaintiffs Motion must be denied.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case involves Sherman Act claims for unlawful monopolization and attempted monopolization in the market for fixed-price natural gas baseload transactions at the Houston Shipping Channel (“HSC”). Plaintiff Rio Grande…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- NuVasive, Inc. v. Renaissance Surgical Center North, L.P.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- In re: Richmont Capital Partners VII, LPUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2026
- Pierce v. Aircraft Finance Corporation, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021