Legal Opinion
United States v. Dominic Alessio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1976No. 74--1550PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MERRILL and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and WOLLENBERG, * District Judge. WOLLENBERG, District Judge:
Appellant Dominic Alessio and Anthony Santiago were charged in a three-count indictment returned December 7, 1972. Appellant was charged in Count One with having given items of-value to Santiago with the corrupt intent to influence official acts of Santiago, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(b). Count Two charged appellant with giving these items of value to Santiago “for and because of official acts performed by and to be performed by” Santiago, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(f).…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Alex Carl Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Norman E. McCoy and Mary Louise McCoy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Norman TurkishCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.