State Ex Rel. Evanow v. Seraphim
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The sole question in this case is whether it appears from the written complaint that there is probable cause to believe that the relator is guilty of burglary. Wisconsin statutory law requires that the complaint itself set forth the grounds for probable cause. This differs from federal court procedures where supporting affidavits may be used for the showing of probable cause.
This does not limit the right of the magistrate to ask questions and receive answers at the hearing before him to satisfy himself that probable cause does exist. However, when the adequacy of the written complaint is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State Ex Rel. White v. SimpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. AsfoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Rodney Washington v. Gary BoughtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.