Legal Opinion

Capen v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

No question is raised here as to the authority of the city to make this purchase under its authority to provide parks, the sole question being whether a golf links is of such public importance as to constitute a public utility within the meaning of the law.

We find in the text-books no exact definition of a public utility; in fact, it would be very difficult to construct a definition that would fit every conceivable case. It has been frequently held that the words “public utility” are synonymous with “public use.” 6 Words & Phrases, 5830; Valley City Salt Co. v. Brown, 7 W. Va. 191; State ex…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. State Ex Rel. BestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Salt Co. v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State Ex Rel. Manhattan Const. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Barnes v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Sherman v. BellowsOregon Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Libertarian Party of Wisconsin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Wichita v. ClappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Meyer v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Golf View Realty Co. v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API