Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Newton

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 27, 2013No. 1 CA-CV 11-0797PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

¶ 1 The question before us is whether entry of a judgment in the small claims division of the justice court (“small claims court”) may have claim preclusive effect on a subsequent lawsuit. For the following reasons, we hold that a plaintiff who chooses to litigate a claim under the simplified procedures of small claims court may be barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion from bringing a second lawsuit based on the same claim alleged in the first lawsuit. Because the doctrine applies here, we affirm the superior court’s order dismissing a complaint that involved the same…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Orselet v. DeMatteoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Hindmarsh v. MockIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hara v. ReichertNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In re MSR Resort Golf Course LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Hastings v. GrundyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Mara Finch v. Block Incorporated, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
  5. Nationstar v. MagnumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API