Legal Opinion
Hastings v. Grundy
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 14, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04645Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 John Hastings, No. CV-19-4645-PHX-DGC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER 12 vs. 13 Elvin Garry Grundy, III; and The Grundy Law Firm, PLLC, 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff John Hastings has filed an amended motion for default judgment against 19 Defendant Grundy Law Firm. Doc. 23. For reasons stated below, the motion will be 20 denied and this case will be dismissed. 21 I. Background. 22 Plaintiff asserts state law claims for legal malpractice, inadequate representation, 23 and breach of fiduciary duty against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- ReadyLink Healthcare, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Finn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Hall v. LalliArizona Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.