Legal Opinion

Houston v. Goemann

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1917No. 20,498PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Barber district court; Preston B. Gillett, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*439The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by the heirs of Albert M.' Houchin, deceased, against the grantees in a deed of real estate executed and delivered to them by Albert M. Houchin in his life time. The plaintiffs claimed the action was one to recover specific real estate, and demanded a jury trial. The defendants claimed the action was one to cancel the deed on the ground of undue influence. The district court took this view, but called a jury to determine the question of undue influence. Special findings were returned favorable to the defendants, which the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Bethany Hospital Co. v. PhilippiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Mills v. HartzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Atkinson v. J. R. Crowe Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Waggener v. Seever Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Fisher v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Cole v. DrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Karnes Enterprises, Inc. v. QuanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Brush v. BoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API