Legal Opinion

Merchants Nat. Bank v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1947No. 1 Div. 273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The policy in question with reference to the double indemnity benefits contains the following provisioñ, as set out in the opinion of the Court of Appeals: “The provision for Double Indemnity Benefits .shall cease to be in force * * * (b) if the Insured engages in military or naval service in time of war.”

It is our opinion that the provision for double indemnity benefits did cease to be in force prior to the death of the insured, and was not then in force because he had subsequent to the issuance of the policy engaged in military service in time of war, and such service had not terminated at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Myli v. American Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Life Casualty Insurance Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Bending v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Olson v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Field v. Western Life Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Life Casuality Ins. Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Feick v. the Prudential Insurance CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  3. People ex rel. Dietz v. SheehanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API