Life Casualty Insurance Co. v. McLeod
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
(After stating the above facts.) Under the provisions of the policy in the present case, the insured was allowed to serve in the army or navy of the United States; but in time of actual war, it was required that a written permit be obtained for such service and an extra premium paid; and in case of the death of the .insured while enrolled in such service in time of war without having secured the written permission of the company, the company’s-liability was restricted to the net reserve on the policy. In the case of Mattox v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co., 25 Ga. App. 311 (103 S. E.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Ruddock v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Johnson v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Miller v. Illinois Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coit v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Grigsby v. HOUSTON FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Jorgenson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Hayes v. Home Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Hooker v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.