Legal Opinion

La Casa Nino, Inc. v. Plaza Esteban

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 11, 1988No. 87SC160PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Chief Justice.

This case raises the question whether a lessee is entitled to setoff against arrearag-es owed to the lessor the amount of an “entry premium” which the lessor received from a subsequent lessee as consideration for the lessor’s reletting of the premises to the subsequent lessee following the original lessee’s default but before the expiration of the term of the original lessee’s lease. In Plaza Esteban v. La Casa Nino, Inc., 738 P.2d 410 (Colo.App.1987), the court of appeals held that the entry premium could not be set off against the arrear-ages owed by the prior lessee.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tull v. Gundersons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Wanderer v. Plainfield Carton Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Stanspec Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Jelco, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Taylor v. Colorado State Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Klein v. GrynbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. MDM Group Associates, Inc. v. CX Reinsurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Nobody in Particular Presents, Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
  4. Klein v. GrynbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Seidl v. Greentree Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API