Legal Opinion
Fort Worth Lloyds v. Garza
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 19, 1975No. 935PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
NYE, Chief Justice.
We withdraw the original opinion delivered on May 15, 1975, and substitute the following opinion limiting the facts discussed in this opinion to those alleged in the complainant’s petition which was filed against Fort Worth Lloyds’ insureds, Raul Garza and his wife, Carmela G. Garza.
The appellant Fort Worth Lloyds in its motion for rehearing contends in three (8) points of error that this Court erred in considering facts other than the allegations contained in the complainant’s petition in determining the insurer’s duty to defend a lawsuit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company v. MaupinTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Board of Water Eng of State v. Cty of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Citation Insurance v. GomezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wade, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Gonzales v. American States Insurance Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- McLaren v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
- Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc. v. North River Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.