Legal Opinion
Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc. v. North River Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided September 18, 1987No. 05-86-00545-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOPKINS, Justice.
Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc. (Mary Kay) and J & J Pump Service, Inc. (J & J Pump) appeal the granting of a summary judgment against them and in favor of North River Insurance Company (North River). They also complain that the trial court erred in denying their motions for partial summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
In an earlier suit, Mary Kay received a judgment against J & J Pump for damages arising from faulty installation of storage tanks. Mary Kay then brought this suit as a third party beneficiary against North River (J & J Pump’s insurer) on…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Chessher v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Espalin v. Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Adamo v. State Farm Lloyds Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Cullen/Frost Bank of Dallas, N.A. v. Commonwealth Lloyd's Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Attayi, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Travis Central Appraisal District v. Signature Flight Support Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.