Legal Opinion · Dissent

American States Insurance v. Dastar Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 2003No. 01-35412Published

1DissentFerguson, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. In holding that the parties engaged in manipulation of our jurisdiction, the majority fails to recognize the difference in litigating the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. It also fashions a new rule of law which requires that before a voluntary dismissal of independent claims can be approved, District Courts must certify the appealability of remaining claims pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the process, the majority implies that trial judges who approve the dismissal of a claim without prejudice in order to permit the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Robin James, a Married Person in Her Separate Capacity v. Price Stern Sloan, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Penguin Putnam, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API