Legal Opinion
State v. Holt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 20, 1897No. Nos. 10,751—(19)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Case certified from the district court for Grant county, C. L. Brown, J., on the question of the sufficiency of an indictment for the sale of intoxicating liquor without a license.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
The indictment against the defendant is as follows:
“Martin P. Holt is accused by the grand jury of the county of Grant, in the state of Minnesota, by this indictment, of the crime of selling and disposing of malt liquor in less quantity than five gallons without first having obtained license therefor, committed as follows: The said Martin P. Holt, on the 28th day of July, A. D. 1896, at the village of Elbow Lake, in the county of Grant, and state of Minnesota, did then and there sell and dispose to one Patrick Stack four quarts of malt liquor, commonly called lager beer, worth and of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HanleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- State v. OrthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. LangdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- State v. LangdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BolsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- State v. SeelingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State v. ArbesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State v. DeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.