State v. Seeling
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Gust Seeling and six other defendants, having been convicted of fishing with a net or seine by a jury in justice court, appealed to the district court for Martin county upon questions of law alone. The appeal was heard before Quinn, J., who made findings and ordered judgment, affirming in all things the judgment of the justice. Erom the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.
Defendant, after conviction in justice court upon a charge of illegal fishing with a seine on April 10, 1912, in violation of Laws 1905, p, 598, c. 344, as amended by Laws 1907, p. 724, c. 469, and Laws 1909, p. 216, c. 190, to which we will hereafter refer as chapter 190, appealed to the district court on law alone, and after affirmance there appealed from the judgment.
Chapter 190, with certain immaterial exceptions, prohibits the taking of more than 25 fish in one day, or in any manner other than by angling. Though defendant entered a plea of not guilty, he did not challenge the sufficiency…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National German-American Bank v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- State v. HoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MathiasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. MinorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State v. Minneapolis Cold Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. KalvigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.