Legal Opinion

State v. Decker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 2018No. A16-0830PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MCKEIG, Justice.

*386Daniel Decker was convicted of fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct and indecent exposure for sending a picture of his genitals to a minor via Facebook Messenger. He appeals, arguing that he did not meet the "presence" requirement of either crime because he and the victim were in different physical locations, and because he only sent a likeness of his genitals, rather than exposing his actual genitals. We hold that Decker's simultaneous electronic communications with a minor are sufficient to support his convictions. We therefore affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

FACT…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Welfare of K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  2. State of Minnesota v. Brandon Stuart MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  3. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan James Martens, AppellantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API