Goffe v. Foulke Mgmt. Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, P.J.A.D.
*251*264The plaintiffs in these two actions claim they were victimized by the wrongful conduct1 of defendant car dealers. Their sales contracts incorporated arbitration provisions which were enforced by motion in both cases. Because the record establishes the sales contracts, even if fully and mutually formed, were rescinded, and because plaintiffs' claims seem to mostly if not entirely relate to defendants' performance of the parties' agreements to rescind, which did not contain arbitration provisions, we reverse the orders dismissing these actions and remand.
*265I
Soon after the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Janell Goffe v. Foulke Management Corp Sasha Robinson and Tijuana Johnson v. Mall Chevrolet (081258) (Camden County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
- Hector Huertas v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- LOMONICO v. FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020