Baatz v. Arrow Bar
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Facts
Kenny Baatz claims he and his wife, Peggy, were seriously injured when a vehicle operated by a drunk driver, Roland McBride, crossed the center line of a Sioux Falls street and struck and crushed them. Baatz also claims the Arrow Bar served alcoholic beverages to McBride while he was intoxicated prior to the accident. Therefore, Baatz claims that the Arrow Bar’s negligence in serving alcoholic beverages to an already intoxicated person contributed further to McBride’s intoxication and to their injuries.1
The trial court granted summary judgment to the Arrow Bar based on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Daugaard v. Baltic Cooperative Building Supply Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Walz v. City of HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Smith v. SewellTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Kyllo v. PanzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Knowles v. United StatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Certif. of Questions of LawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.