Legal Opinion

Canterbury Termite Control, Inc. v. Structural Pest Control Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1989No. B028877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DEVICH, J.

Canterbury Termite Control, Inc. (Canterbury), appeals from the judgment entered following denial of its petition for a writ of mandate against the California Structural Pest Control Board (Board). We hold that Board’s decision imposing discipline upon Canterbury was based, in part, upon an incorrect interpretation of law and remand the matter for further proceedings.

Background

The facts are not in dispute. Canterbury is licensed to provide services to control, inter alia, household pests. In 1984, unlicensed personnel employed by Canterbury spoke by telephone with potential…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Weissbuch v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Varanelli v. Structural Pest Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Alba v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. American Bankers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. American Bankers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Pestmaster Services, Inc. v. Structural Pest Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API