United States v. Arrelucea-Zamudio
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
In certain federal judicial districts, “fast-track” programs allow qualifying immigrant defendants to plead guilty while waiving, among other things, their appellate and post-conviction rights. In turn, the Government agrees to request a departure from the relevant Sentencing Guidelines range. None of the districts in the Third Circuit is a fast-track district.
Pedro Manuel Arrelueea-Zamudio (“Arrelucea”) pled guilty to illegal reentry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The District Court sentenced him to 48 months’…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. GroberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Reyes-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Lopez-MaciasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Shoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- United States v. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.