Legal Opinion

United States v. Arrelucea-Zamudio

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 14, 2009No. 08-4397PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

In certain federal judicial districts, “fast-track” programs allow qualifying immigrant defendants to plead guilty while waiving, among other things, their appellate and post-conviction rights. In turn, the Government agrees to request a departure from the relevant Sentencing Guidelines range. None of the districts in the Third Circuit is a fast-track district.

Pedro Manuel Arrelueea-Zamudio (“Arrelucea”) pled guilty to illegal reentry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The District Court sentenced him to 48 months’…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. GroberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Reyes-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Lopez-MaciasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Shoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  5. United States v. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API