Legal Opinion
Rudin v. Tax Commission of New York (In re Olympia & York Maiden Lane Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 14, 1999No. Bankruptcy Nos. 98-B-46167, 98-B-46168 (JLG); Adversary No. 98-9384APublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND MITCHELL E. RU-DIN’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON HIS COMPLIANT SEEKING A MANDATORY INJUNCTION DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO ACCEPT THE TAX CERTIORARI PETITION OF OLYMPIA & YORK MAIDEN LANE COMPANY LLC AND OLYMPIA & YORK FINANCE CORPORATION NUNC PRO TUNC TO OCTOBER 23, 1998
JAMES L. GARRITY, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this adversary proceeding, Mitchell E. Rudin (“Rudin” or “Receiver”), as receiver of certain improved real property located at 59 Maiden Lane, New York, New York (the “Property”), seeks an injunction under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7001…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alberts v. Tuft (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp.)District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- McConnell v. K-2 Mortgage (In Re McConnell)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011