Legal Opinion
Wolinsky v. Bradford National Bank
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided August 16, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-118PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COFFRIN, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of Bankruptcy Judge Charles J. Marro dismissing with prejudice the complaints of the trustee (appellant) and debtors as intervenors for recovery of an alleged preference. The alleged preference is based on the transfer of cattle from the debtor to the defendant Bank. The cattle were later sold at auction and the proceeds applied to a debt the debt- or owed the Bank. Appellant contends the Bank did not have a perfected security interest in the cattle and as such had a preference which could be avoided by appellant-trustee.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Hanrahan's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Fuller v. HofferbertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- In Re Gilchrist CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Corwin Consultants, Inc. v. The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., Samuel A. Culbertson, Ii, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Tower v. TowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jennifer Cushman v. Trans Union CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- In Re HendersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- First Bank of South Dakota v. Asbridge (In Re Asbridge)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1984
- Cushman v. Trans Union CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Delaney v. MesserDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.