Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 21, 2025No. 21m/24Published

1Opinion of the Court

Harry Davis, Jr. v. State of Maryland, Misc. No. 21, September Term, 2024 INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF SENTENCE – FAILURE TO CONSULT – Supreme Court of Maryland held defendant may establish ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668

(1984), based on counsel’s failure to file motion for modification of sentence by demonstrating that counsel failed to consult with defendant about filing motion and that counsel’s failure to consult with defendant was not reasonable, i.e., that counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API