Legal Opinion

Kaczka v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 2, 2010No. 1-09-1283PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Plaintiff, Thomas Kaczka, appeals from the judgment of the circuit court confirming a decision by the Retirement Board of the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago (the Board), which denied his application for a reinstatement of a widower’s annuity benefit under the Illinois Pension Code (the Pension Code) (40 ILCS 5/5 — 101 et seq. (West Supp. 2007)). On appeal, plaintiff contends that: (1) his widower’s benefits were subject to mandatory reinstatement pursuant to section 5 — 147 of the Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/5 — 147 (West Supp. 2007)); (2) the Board’s 1992 decision…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Marconi v. Chicago Heights Police Pension BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Napleton v. Village of HinsdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Majid v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. People v. GuytonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  3. Crossroads Ford Truck Sales v. Sterling Truck CorporationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. In re Vincent K.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Majid v. The Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API