Legal Opinion
Mattingly v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 8, 2007No. 4:06CV789 HEAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
486 F.Supp.2d 964 (2007)
Nancy MATTINGLY and Terry M. Mattingly, Plaintiffs,
v.
MEDTRONIC, INC., Defendant.
No. 4:06CV789 HEA.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.
March 8, 2007.
Paul J. Passanante, Dawn M. Mefford, Simon and Passanante, PC, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiffs.
Lori Gail Cohen, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Atlanta, GA, Robert Lawrence Purdy, Minneapolis, MN, Patrick Lysaught, Baker and Sterchi, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant.
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
AUTREY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 31].…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hughes v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009