Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Crouch

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 10, 1884PublishedCited by 43 opinions

ORIGINAL. This was a motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The grounds for the motion are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

This petition is denied. The general revenue law of Virginia provides that no person shall do business in the State as a “ sample merchant ” until he has obtained a license therefor, on payment of a tax of seventy-five dollars; and that, if he does, he shall pay a fine of five hundred dollars for the first' offence, and six hundred dollars for each succeeding offence. Acts of Virginia, 1881, ch. 115, §§ 30, 31, pp. 578, 579. The petitioner has been informed against, and is now held in custody for trial by order of the Hustings Court of the City of Richmond, for a violation of this law.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Ex Parte CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Brown v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Harkrader v. WadleySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Commonwealth v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Ex Parte BigelowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API