Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Curtis

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 18, 1882PublishedCited by 163 opinions

Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The sixth section of the act of Aug. 15,1876, c. 287, entitled ' “ An Act making appropriations for the legislative, executive, and judicial expenses of the government,” provides “ that all executive officers or employés of the United'States not appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, are prohibited from requesting, giving to, or receiving from, any other officer or employé of the government, any money or…

Read the full summary

Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The sixth section of the act of Aug. 15,1876, c. 287, entitled ' “ An Act making appropriations for the legislative, executive, and judicial expenses of the government,” provides “ that all executive officers or employés of the United'States not appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, are prohibited from requesting, giving to, or receiving from, any other officer or employé of the government, any money or property or other thing of value for political purposes ; and any such officer or employé who shall offend against the…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

The act is not one to prohibit all contributions, of money or *372property by tbe designated officers and employés of tbe United States for political purposes. Neither does it prohibit them altogether- from receiving or soliciting money or property for such purposes. It simply forbids their receiving from or giving to each other. Beyond this no restrictions are placed on any of their political privileges.

That the government of the United States is one of delegated powers only, and that its authority is defined and limited by the Constitution, are no longer open questions; but express authority is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex Parte RowlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API