Legal Opinion

Payne v. Lowe

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1968No. 6823SC354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

Defendants’ first assignment of error relates to the refusal of the trial judge to permit the feme defendant to state her opinion as to the speed of plaintiff’s automobile. The record fails to disclose what her answer would have been if allowed to testify.

The exclusion of testimony cannot be held prejudicial when the record fails to show what the answer of the witness would have been had she been permitted to testify. 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 49. The assignment of error is overruled.

Defendants’ second major assignment of error relates to the charge of the trial judge to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. CCT Equipment Co. v. Hertz CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Barnes v. CaulbourneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Howard v. CarmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Kelly v. AshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Redman v. NanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API