Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided October 1, 2008No. 06-08-00046-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MOSELEY.

After the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence, Ross Layton Ford pleaded guilty to having possessed less than two ounces of marihuana. The trial court found the evidence substantiated Ford’s guilt, but deferred entry of a finding of guilt and placed Ford on community supervision for a period of twelve months. Ford now appeals, contending the trial court erred by denying his suppression motion. We reverse the judgment.

The Standard of Review

We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress for an abuse of discretion. State v. Ross, 32 S.W.3d…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Ford, Ross LaytonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. Ford, Ross LaytonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API