Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Board of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1908No. Civ. No. 422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Mandamus. Petitioner prayed for a writ directing defendants to issue and deliver to him a high school certificate. Defendants had the judgment, from which plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll alone.

It is alleged in the complaint that on August 1, 1901, there was duly issued to him a high school certificate by defendant board, which said certificate was to continue in force for the period of six years from its date; that pursuant to proceedings taken by said board on July 9, 1904, it wrongfully and unlawfully passed the following resolution: “Be it resolved that the certificate of the said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Town of Hayward v. PimentalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Pereria v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Jackson School District v. CulbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Jaquith v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API