Ferguson v. Board of Education
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Mandamus. Petitioner prayed for a writ directing defendants to issue and deliver to him a high school certificate. Defendants had the judgment, from which plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll alone.
It is alleged in the complaint that on August 1, 1901, there was duly issued to him a high school certificate by defendant board, which said certificate was to continue in force for the period of six years from its date; that pursuant to proceedings taken by said board on July 9, 1904, it wrongfully and unlawfully passed the following resolution: “Be it resolved that the certificate of the said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Price v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Town of Hayward v. PimentalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Pereria v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Jackson School District v. CulbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Jaquith v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926