Legal Opinion
Boston-Continental National Bank v. Hub Fruit Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 12, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
The plaintiff bank seeks to recover as a holder for value of a check for $830 dated July 13, 1931, drawn by the defendant on the Atlantic National Bank and payable to the order of McReavey & Company who indorsed the check “For deposit only to the credit of McReavey & Co.” and on the day of its date delivered it to the plaintiff bank where that company had a checking account. With the check was delivered a deposit slip furnished by the plaintiff which listed this check and several others deposited at the same time. The deposit slip bore the printed statement: “Depositors are Hereby Notified…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Furber v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Manufacturers' National Bank v. Continental BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Freeman's National Bank v. National Tube Works Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Wood v. Boylston National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bowling Green, Inc. v. State Street Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Forastiere v. Springfield Institution For SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Krinsky v. Pilgrim Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
- Harding v. Broadway National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.