B.P. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DIAMANTIS, Judge.
B.P. petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that he can not be punished for indirect criminal contempt by incarceration in the juvenile detention center for his failure to comply with a court order. B.P. argues that section 39.043(1) of the Florida Statutes (1990) prohibits the use of a secure detention facility as a sanction for contempt, relying upon T.D.L. v. Chinault, 570 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We reject this argument and deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus. See A.A. v. Rolle, 580 So.2d 282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). See also In the Interest of T.S.,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- TDL v. ChinaultDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- AA v. RolleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- In Interest of TsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- In the Interest of R.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- S.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- B.P. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- BP v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- DHRS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.