B.P. v. State

We quash B.P. v. State, 588 So.2d 39 (Fla. 5th DCA1991), on the authority of A.A. v. Rolle, 604 So.2d 813 (Fla.1992), and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Rolle.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., dissent.