Legal Opinion

S.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 3, 1992No. 92-665, 92-688PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. SHARP, Judge.

S.J. and J.F. filed petitions for writ of habeas corpus. We consolidate them for disposition because they involve similar issues: can a child be detained pursuant to section 39.044 prior to an adjudicatory hearing, if the child is ineligible for detention pursuant to the risk management assessment and the criteria specified in section 39.044(2); and the only basis for continued detention is the child’s failure to appear at arraignment and a resulting pending charge of indirect criminal contempt of court for failure to appear? The petitioners argue they are entitled to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. AA v. RolleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. B.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. L.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. WN v. FryerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Z.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Melvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. AK v. DobulerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. AMW v. PortesyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. C.J. v. RolleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. JL v. McCormickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API