Legal Opinion
Garcia v. CRICO of James Street Crossing Ltd. Partnership
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 15, 2004No. 53916-7-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — MAR 7.1(a), the rule governing serving and filing of requests for trials de novo, requires only proof that a copy of the written request has been served on all the other parties appearing in the case, rather than a standard “proof of service.” That proof must contain only some evidence of the time, place, and manner of service. Such proof was present here. The superior court’s order is reversed and the case remanded for a trial de novo.
2Per curiam
*809FACTS
¶2 Glendi Garcia slipped and fell on CRICO of James Street Crossing Limited Partnership’s (CRICO) property. Garcia sued CRICO and the case moved to…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Manius v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Terry v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Manius v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Carpenter v. ElwayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Brackman v. City of Lake Forest ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Brackman v. CITY OF LAKE FOREST PARKCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Vanderpol v. SchotzkoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Vanderpol v. SchotzkoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Garcia v. CRICO of James Street Crossing Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004