Abud v. Department of Employment
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVID, J. *
In 1967, the plaintiffs received payments from a “vacation fund,” which the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (hereafter designated as the Board) held were wages which operated pro tanto to diminish the unemployment insurance payments which plaintiffs claimed, under Unemployment Insurance Code sections 1252 and 1279. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, the trial court reviewed the transcript of the proceedings, taking no further evidence, and reversed the Board’s ruling. Although the facts are not in dispute, the court purported to make findings, gave judgment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Thomas v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Conner v. Phoenix Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Bradshaw v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Jones v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prescod v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Morris v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Donais v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981