General Motors Corp. v. National Auto Radiator Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is a conflict of laws case in which this court is asked to decide whether the law of Michigan or the law of Ontario, Canada, should be applied to resolve the issues presented on appeal. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor held that under Michigan conflict of laws rules, the law of Ontario is controlling. She granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees, National Auto Radiator Manufacturing Co. (National Radiator) and Central Stamping, Ltd. (Central Stamping), both of which are Canadian corporations. GM sought contribution or indemnity under Michigan law from the Canadian…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. ChallonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sexton v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Sweeney v. SweeneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Precision Gear Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Nicolette v. CareyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
- General Motors Corporation v. National Auto Radiator Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Precision Gear Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013