Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Chapman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2006No. 23702PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Appellant, David Chapman, (David), filed a motion for the genetic testing of a daughter born to the Appellee, Michele Chapman, (Michele), during the course of the parties’ marriage. However, his motion was entered more than sixty days, and in fact, more than three years after the birth of the child. The trial court denied the motion. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] David and Michele were married on January 20, 1999. During the course of the marriage, Michele became pregnant. Michele moved from the marital home in 2000 when she was approximately six months…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. PellegrinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Rotenberger v. BurghduffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. $1,010.00 IN AMERICAN CURRENCYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Dakota Plains AG Center, LLC v. SmitheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. MirandaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API