Legal Opinion
Robert E. Pearl v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 7, 2013No. 11-253CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RCFC 52.1; RCFC 12(b)(6); Military disability pay; 10 U.S.C. § 1201; 10 U.S.C. § 1203; Arbitrary and capricious; Substantial evidence
OPINION and ORDER
Block, Judge.
Plaintiff was honorably discharged from the United States Army (“Army”) on April 30, 2005, with a 10 percent disability rating. This rating entitled him to severance pay under 10 U.S.C. § 1212. AR at 87, 991. The United States Army reviewed plaintiffs rating determination and affirmed it on February 15, 2011. Id. at 1-2. Plaintiff challenges this determination alleging that the Army was arbitrary and capricious in its…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lippmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Arroyo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Cumbie v. KendallDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Exnicios v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.