Legal Opinion

Schaffer v. Donegan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1990No. 11168PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action, novel in character, brought against a physician in his capacity as an expert who agreed to provide assistance to and testimony on behalf of a Plaintiff in a medical malpractice case The claim is made that the expert, by reason of changing his opinion, breached his contract to testify and his duty to provide the other parties to his contract with timely notice of his change of opinion. It is alleged that by reason of these failures the Claimants in the medical malpractice case, now Appellants herein, were damaged.

Appellants' claims were tried before a jury, which returned a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Davison v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. EidingOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Clevenger v. HulingOhio Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Panitz v. BehrendSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Hanna v. Groom, 07ap-502 (2-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Tidewater Finance Co. v. CownsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Hoskins v. MetzgerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API