Legal Opinion

Hucklebridge v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1903No. 13,024PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Greenwood district court; G. P. Aikman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*444The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J. :

This is an action brought to recover damages from the railway company for negligently furnishing to plaintiffs, to be used in the transportation of their cattle, infected cars, by reason of which the cattle of plaintiffs contracted splenic or Texas fever, to the damage of plaintiffs.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. In the former review (62 Kan. 506, 64 Pac. 58) the judgment of'the trial court was reversed, for the reason that the evidence showed that the cattle were the partnership property of plaintiff,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Annie Service v. Farmington Savings BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Thomas v. Fame InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HucklebridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Motsenbocker v. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Ross v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Birmingham Gas Co. v. SanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Lyons v. BerlauSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Harlan v. LoomisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API