Legal Opinion

Harlan v. Loomis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1914No. Nos. 18,852 and 18,853PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeals from Lyon district court; Charles A. Smart, judge pro tern.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

These actions were brought to recover rents for the use of a certain tract of land the possession of which had been the subject Of earlier litigation. (Stouffer v. Harlan, 68 Kan. 135, 74 Pac. 610, 64 L. R. A. 320, 104 Am. St. Rep. 396; Stouffer v. Harlan, 84 Kan. 307, 114 Pac. 385.) The first of the actions now under consideration, in which James S. Harlan was named as plaintiff, was brought on August 14, 1909, to recover from Sanford Loomis the rentals of the land for the years 1906, 1907 and 1908 *399at the rate of $500 for each year.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stouffer v. HarlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Annie Service v. Farmington Savings BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Gatton v. TolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Cunningham v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Hucklebridge v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vorhees v. BaltazarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Sundgren v. Topeka Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Shinkle v. Union City Body Co.United States District Court for the District of Arkansas · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API