Legal Opinion
Nuvox Communications, Inc. v. Bellsouth Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 18, 2008No. 07-13028PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
This case arises from a decision of the Florida Public Service Commission (the “Florida Commission”). The Florida Commission, relying on a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision, concluded that federal law did not require BellSouth (“Defendants”) to combine (or “commingle”) facilities that must be provided under 47 U.S.C. § 271 with those that must be provided under 47 U.S.C. § 251. Nuvox Communications, Inc. and Xspedius Communications, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) challenged the Florida Commission’s decision in federal court, and the district court ruled that the decision was contrary to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- At&T Communications of the Southern States, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co., Inc. v. BoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Qwest Corp. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Bellsouth Telecomm., Inc. v. Kentucky Pub. Serv. Comm'nDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
- BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Kentucky Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.