Legal Opinion
Bellsouth Telecomm., Inc. v. Kentucky Pub. Serv. Comm'n
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided May 1, 2009No. 6:03-misc-00004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge.
Defendants SouthEast Telephone (“SouthEast”) and Kentucky Public Service Commission (“Commission”), along with Plaintiff BellSouth Telecommunications (“AT & T Kentucky”), have been engaged in a protracted legal battle over the pricing of certain network elements. Specifically, AT & T Kentucky seeks payment for services provided to SouthEast, for which SouthEast did not pay the amount specified in the negotiated interconnection agreement. SouthEast contends that it paid the appropriate price based on § 271 of the Telecommunications…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Qwest Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Verizon New England, Inc. v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Nuvox Communications, Inc. v. Bellsouth Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Kentucky Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Kentucky Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010
- BellSouth Telecommunications v. Kentucky Public Service Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012