Legal Opinion

Brigati v. Worcester Polytechnic Institute

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 18, 2021No. 2:21-cv-14098Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 21-14098-CV-CANNON/MAYNARD STEVEN BRIGATI, Plaintiff, v. WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE, and HFM, INC., Defendants. ______________________________/ REPORT RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RULE 41(d) FEES AND COSTS BE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART THIS CAUSE is before me upon Defendants’ Rule 41(d) Motion for Costs and Attorneys’ Fees (“Motion”) [DE 22] in which Defendants seek (1) to recover attorney’s fees and costs incurred in a prior case that Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed, and (2) for this case to be stayed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kenneth Henley v. Willie E. Johnson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Beth B. Pontenberg v. Boston ScientificCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Cadle Co. v. BeuryDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API