Legal Opinion

Cadle Co. v. Beury

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided March 28, 2007No. 406CV255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDENFIELD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff The Cadle Company (“Cadle”) brought this collection case seeking a property-foreclosure deficiency judgment against defendants Harold R. and Sandra J. Beury. Doc. # 1. Cadle, however, had previously filed and voluntarily dismissed a similar ease in a Texas court, so this Court ordered briefing on the appropriate amount of F.R.Civ.P. 41(d) costs that Cadle should first pay to the defendants before this case proceeds. Doc. # 33. The parties have complied. Doc. ## 36, 37.

II. BACKGROUND1

The Beurys executed three promissory notes to purchase…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Shirley K. Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Missouri State Life Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Gerald Paul Esposito v. Francis PiatrowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Behrle v. OlshanskyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stella Andrews v. America's Living Centers, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. Ansley v. SpicerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
  3. Brigati v. Worcester Polytechnic InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
  4. Monterey at Malibu Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Empire Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API