Van v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
A jury convicted movant of Stealing, third offense, in violation of § 570.040, *691RSMo 1986, and the court sentenced him as a persistent offender to 15 years imprisonment. We affirmed his conviction and sentence on direct appeal. State v. Van, 665 S.W.2d 373 (Mo.App.1984).
Movant filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion, and the case proceeded to hearing on the original motion. Movant alleged 20 separate grounds for relief, hut the motion court concluded only one of the asserted grounds, no. 11,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BoclairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Horn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989