Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Division of Community Services

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Margaret Boyle appeals pro se from a judgment following a bench trial in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Lipez, J.). She sought to compel the production of a memo in the possession of the Division of Community Services (“DCS”) under Maine’s Freedom of Access Law, 1 M.R. S.A. §§ 401-410 (1989 & Supp.1990); the court ruled that DCS was not required to disclose the memo. We affirm.

Ms. Boyle, then known as Margaret Alexander, previously sought to compel pro*490duction of all DCS documents relating to her application for the Home Energy Assistance Program (“HEAP”). See Alexander v. Division of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guy Gannett Publishing Co. v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  2. Bangor Publishing Co. v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  3. Alexander v. Division of Community ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Springfield Terminal Railway Co. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Marcel Dubois v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Anastos v. Town of BrunswickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  4. SPRINGFIELD TERM. RY. v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API