Legal Opinion

SPRINGFIELD TERM. RY. v. Dept. of Transp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 30, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

754 A.2d 353 (2000)

2000 ME 126

SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY

v.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Argued April 3, 2000.

Decided June 30, 2000.

Thad B. Zmistowski, Eaton Peabody Bradford & Veague, P.A., Bangor, for plaintiff.

Andrew Ketterer, Attorney General, Christopher C. Jernigan, Asst. Attorney General (orally), James E. Smith, Chief Counsel, Department of Transportation, Augusta, for defendant.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, SAUFLEY, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.

CLIFFORD, J.

[¶ 1] Springfield Terminal Railway Company appeals from a judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Fmc Corporation, Douglas E. Kliever and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor v. Bally's Park Place Hotel & Casino and Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Ashmead v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API