Legal Opinion

Vistar Bank v. Thompson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1997No. S-95-1318PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C.J.

This case is a law action brought by appellee, Vistar Bank (Vistar), against appellant, Richard N. Thompson, for payment of an account due as a result of legal services provided to Thompson by the law firm of Nelson & Harding and its successor firm Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell (HBRR). HBRR assigned the account to Vistar for collection. The parties waived a jury trial, and the district court for Lancaster County found Thompson personally liable for the account to Vistar. Thompson now appeals.

In October 1987, Thompson approached the Nelson & Harding law firm regarding representation for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sherrod v. State of Nebraska Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cotton v. OstroskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Blanchard v. City of RalstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Vistar Bank v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burnison v. JohnstonNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Blue Creek Farm, Inc. v. Aurora Cooperative Elevator Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API